ChatPaper.aiChatPaper

EBench:通用型移動操作策略的元素級診斷

EBench: Elemental Diagnosis of Generalist Mobile Manipulation Policies

June 20, 2026
作者: Ning Gao, Jinliang Zheng, Xing Gao, Haoxiang Ma, Hanqing Wang, Yukai Wang, Jiantong Chen, Zanxin Chen, Shujie Zhang, Mingda Jia, Xuekun Jiang, Zihou Zhu, Xinyu Li, Shuai Wang, Hao Li, Wenzhe Cai, Yuqiang Yang, Xudong Xu, Zhaoyang Lyu, Yao Mu, Tai Wang, Jiangmiao Pang, Jia Zeng, Weinan Zhang, Chunhua Shen
cs.AI

摘要

我們提出EBench,這是一個模擬基準測試,用於診斷通用型移動操作策略,超越單一的成功率指標。EBench包含26個多樣且具挑戰性的操作任務,並沿5個能力維度與4個泛化維度進行標註。我們評估了最先進的通用操作模型,包括π_0、π_{0.5}、XVLA與InternVLA-A1,並發現成功率相近的模型在能力特徵上存在顯著差異:π_{0.5}達到最高的測試成功率與最佳的訓練-測試保留率,而InternVLA-A1在移動操作上表現突出,但在靈巧任務上則明顯不足;XVLA則在一組與其他策略不重疊的基本技能上展現優勢。除了能力特徵分析,EBench還從4個具代表性的角度探討泛化能力,識別不同分佈偏移因素的影響。結果揭示了各模型在總體分數背後的優缺點。我們期望此基準能提供廣泛的診斷信號,以引導通用操作模型的迭代改進。
English
We present EBench, a simulation benchmark that diagnoses generalist mobile manipulation policies beyond a single success-rate scalar. EBench comprises 26 diverse and challenging manipulation tasks annotated along 5 capability dimensions and 4 generalization dimensions. We evaluate state-of-the-art generalist manipulation models including π_0, π_{0.5}, XVLA, and InternVLA-A1, and reveal that models with near success rates exhibit strikingly different capability profiles: π_{0.5} achieves the highest test success rate and the best train--test retention, whereas InternVLA-A1 dominates mobile manipulation but collapses on dexterous tasks, and XVLA exhibits strengths on a disjoint set of atomic skills compared to other policies. Beyond capability profiling, EBench analyzes the generalization ability from 4 representative perspectives, identifying the impact of different distribution shift factors. The results reveal strengths and weaknesses of models behind an overall score. We hope this benchmark offers a broad set of diagnostic signals to guide iteration on generalist manipulation models.