ChatPaper.aiChatPaper

TimeLens2:基於多模態大語言模型的通用影片時間定位

TimeLens2: Generalist Video Temporal Grounding with Multimodal LLMs

July 19, 2026
作者: Yuhan Zhu, Changlian Ma, Xiangyu Zeng, Xinhao Li, Zhiqiu Zhang, Songze Li, Jun Zhang, Tianxiang Jiang, Yuandong Yang, Ziang Yan, Zikang Wang, Xinyu Chen, Haoran Chen, Shaowei Zhang, Limin Wang
cs.AI

摘要

视频多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)能够描述视频中发生的内容,但很少能识别出支撑证据出现的时间位置。我们研究通用型视频时间定位任务,即单一模型需预测跨不同视频长度、领域、查询形式和视角的可变基数证据区间集合。现有训练策略与此集合值任务存在错位:长视频的标注常依赖于脆弱的单次标注,而强化学习奖励要么无法区分不相交预测,要么需要脆弱的片段匹配。TimeLens2将时间证据视为区间集合进行全程监督与优化。TimeLens2-93K通过基于描述的提议生成、独立定位、跨模型共识、语义验证及边界精修构建了可靠的多跨度监督。我们的时间Wasserstein奖励在合并区间支撑集上的均匀分布间计算精确的一维W₁距离,提供稠密且无需匹配的反馈,适用于不等基数与等效碎片化场景;时间IoU则以精确重叠反馈作为补充。在七个基准测试中,TimeLens2-2B在每个基准上的表现均优于所有同规模基线,而4B和8B变体则达到最先进水平,超越了参数量高达397B的开源模型。2B、4B和8B变体相较于其Qwen3-VL骨干网络,分别提升了14.2、13.0和18.1 mIoU个点。
English
Video multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can describe what happens in a video, but rarely identify when the supporting evidence occurs. We study generalist video temporal grounding, in which one model predicts a variable-cardinality set of evidence intervals across video lengths, domains, query forms, and viewpoints. Existing training strategies are misaligned with this set-valued task: long-video labels often rely on brittle one-pass annotation, while reinforcement-learning rewards either fail to distinguish non-overlapping predictions or require fragile segment matching. TimeLens2 treats temporal evidence as an interval set throughout supervision and optimization. TimeLens2-93K constructs reliable multi-span supervision through caption-derived proposals, independent localization, cross-agent consensus, semantic verification, and boundary refinement. Our temporal Wasserstein reward computes exact one-dimensional \(W_1\) between uniform distributions over merged interval supports, providing dense, matching-free feedback under unequal cardinalities and equivalent fragmentation; temporal IoU complements it with precise-overlap feedback. Across seven benchmarks, TimeLens2-2B outperforms all size-matched baselines on every benchmark, while the 4B and 8B variants achieve state-of-the-art performance, surpassing open-source models with up to 397B parameters. The 2B, 4B, and 8B variants improve over their Qwen3-VL backbones by 14.2, 13.0, and 18.1 mIoU points, respectively.