ChatPaper.aiChatPaper

更密集≠更好:持續後訓練中同策略自我蒸餾的局限性

Denser neq Better: Limits of On-Policy Self-Distillation for Continual Post-Training

July 2, 2026
作者: Meng Wang, Haohan Zhao, Wenzhuo Liu, Lu Yang, Geng Liu, Haiyang Guo, Guo-Sen Xie, Gaofeng Meng, Hongbin Liu, Fei Zhu
cs.AI

摘要

持續後訓練使基礎模型能夠學習新知識,同時保留既有能力。近期研究指出,在線策略學習可減緩遺忘,其中在線策略自蒸餾特別受到關注。本研究透過自蒸餾策略最佳化(SDPO)重新檢視此樂觀看法。實驗顯示,當教師訊號穩定且對齊良好時,SDPO能加速領域內特化,但難以泛化至分佈外情境。在持續後訓練中,SDPO表現出更強的遺忘現象,甚至可能崩潰,而GRPO等基於在線策略的強化學習方法則以更保守的方式適應,並較好地保留先前能力。進一步分析發現,密集自蒸餾在參數空間與回應空間皆導致較大的偏移,並可能透過自我強化的師生迴圈放大高頻格式偽影。這些發現表明,僅靠線上策略資料不足以實現持續學習。密集自蒸餾雖能在教師目標穩定且詞元級監督可靠時加速特化,但不應視為持續後訓練的預設穩定器。我們的程式碼已開源於 https://github.com/Moenupa/SDPO-CL。
English
Continual post-training enables foundation models to acquire new knowledge while preserving existing capabilities. Recent work suggests that on-policy learning can mitigate forgetting, with on-policy self-distillation emerging as a particularly attractive approach. In this work, we revisit this optimistic view through self-distillation policy optimization (SDPO). Our experiments show that SDPO can accelerate in-domain specialization when teacher signals are stable and well aligned, but it struggles to generalize to out-of-distribution scenarios. In continual post-training, SDPO exhibits stronger forgetting and can even collapse, whereas on-policy reinforcement learning methods such as GRPO adapt more conservatively and better preserve prior capabilities. Further analyses reveal that denser self-distillation induces larger drift in both parameter space and response space, and can amplify high-frequency formatting artifacts through a self-reinforcing teacher--student loop. These findings suggest that on-policy data alone is insufficient for continual learning. Dense self-distillation can accelerate specialization when teacher targets are stable and token-level supervision is reliable, but it should not be treated as a default stabilizer for continual post-training. Our code is available at https://github.com/Moenupa/SDPO-CL.